Jackson 3 Tour? – Ian Halperin, the biographer of Michael Jackson, told reporters that Joe Jackson wants Michael Jackson’s children to tour as the “Jackson 3″ in 2010.
The bizarre rumor of a Jackson 3 tour involving Michael Jackson’s children Prince Michael I, Paris Michael, and prince Michael II, aka “Blanket” astounded the King of Pop’s fans.
Jackson’s biographer Ian Halperin told the London’s The Sun newspaper: “Joe wants the children to go on a world tour in 2010. He has also already offered recording contracts to two of Michael’s kids. Now he is talking about getting them the world’s best backing band and taking them on tour as The Jackson Three.”
Halperin told reporters Sunday that his source for the allegations is extremely close to the family and may soon speak out publicly — out of concern for the future of the youngsters.
He told reporters for The Sun: “One of the family members is livid. He is saying Joe seems intent to do this no matter what. “He wants to exploit the kids the same way he did Michael.”
And that’s the latest news on the bizarre rumor of Michael Jackson’s kids doing a 2010 Jackson 3 tour.
Tags: jackson 3, jackson 3 tour, michael jackson, michael jackson chldren, michael jackson kids
July 13th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
What an azz Joe Jackson is, I can’t wait until he dies and hope his remaining children get to dance on his grave. My dad was an azz and beat me too I know what those guys went through. And now he wants to exploit Michaels children? Man I’m seeing red right now, what is wrong with Katherine? Is she that afraid of that old man? lol. He needs to be tarred and feathered or just hold him still and let everyone stand in line to take a whack. And hope the honorable racist Al Sharpton is standing right next to Joe waiting for his whacks. What a freakin waste of oxygen
July 18th, 2009 at 7:23 am
I’m with “1. As for sharpton, I doubt honor has any thing to do with his
“schtick” if exploitation has a face it fat Al’s.
July 18th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
Wow, thats incredibly sad. How inconsiderate he is to his own famile. First, his own children, now is grands? Mmmm, I truly feel bad for those kids, they need their father back, or even their suntie, but not Joe. Hes quite the azz. I cannot believe hes doing this crap all over again. Those kids don’t need their childhoods stolen. Michael wouldnt want that for them. Its soo sad because they don’t even know the half of it. Bless those kids. I hope something good happens to them. Hopefully it isnt Joe Jackson!
July 18th, 2009 at 1:51 pm
sorry, typos. famile= family, and suntie=auntie. LOL. my bad
Oh, and watch these videos. great!
I believe its the first one that explains about the beatings. some funny stuff in there also. Michael is interesting.
July 18th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
ok i think that is bull crap\
they need a normal child hood
if the kids want 2 they should but they should not i mean NOT BE FORSED into this
July 25th, 2009 at 11:11 pm
Ian Halperin is an idiot! I refuse to listen to anything he has to say. The only thing he has to back up his stories is himself.
He claims Michael Jackson was gay and he knows this because he has “multiple sources” who have told him this. What I would like to know is: why is Ian, an unofficial Canadian biographer, the one and only journalist to know about this? Why would these “lovers” of Michael choose to only talk to him and let him be the one to put Michael’s secret out there? These guys could have made tons of money selling these stories to the tabloids and other media sources. Why would they just choose not to say anything at all until this random biographer who is writing a book about Michael based on his observations and not real facts needs a story? If they were going to sell the story to someone, it would’ve been someone in the media awhile ago so they could’ve made money. Another thing I would like to know is how would Michael have these affairs? Neverland was watched so closely all the time, as was Michael. He couldn’t have a normal life at all, so how is it that he could have these homosexual affairs (or any at all) without SOMEONE in the media seeing it or catching it or being suspicious of it? Sorry Ian, your stories don’t add up and you are about as credible as a monkey.
Also, there have been many journalists who have actually studied Michael’s life and talked to him and those closest to him and they say that there was never any evidence whatsoever that pointed to anything that Ian is claiming. He is an idiot!